Andrei Marga propus preşedinte ICR

2 Comments

1. 

   Prof.Gh.C.Dinulescu-Campina on 2012-08-31 at 11:10 am

   Domnule Presedinte Marga
   Va propun ca editura ICR sa tipareasca lucrarile mele stiintifico-filosofice originale si nonconformiste atat din punct de vedere stiintific cat si filosofic.
   Daca este nevoie, intrun termen rezonabil le pot traduce in engleza, cum am procedat cu “Modelling Rationality…and Beyond Physics” sau in oricare limba care ar aduce lucrarile in fata atentiei internationale.
   Lucrarile la care fac referire sunt:
   1. „MODELAREA RATIONALITATII FIZICE SI METAFIZICE” sau Contributii la “Critica ratiunii pure”– modeleaza pe principii matematice si fizice previzionate de Spinoza, cel mai modern concept filosofic – conceptul rationalist MESER.

   In concordanta cu principiile carteziene din „Discurs asupra metodei”, sunt trecute in revista legile imuabile ale Cosmosului si Universului carora li se acorda o interpretare nonconformista, dar cu inalta valoare epistemologica. Modul de interpretare a continutului „ratiunii pure” fac ca acesta sa para inca eminamente paradoxal. Este de specificat ca legile Cosmosului si Universului sunt abordate nu atat ipotetic cat conjectural, asigurand sistemului filosofic o dezirabila mobilitate interpretativa a fenomenologiei naturale.

   2. „GENESISDICEAE” sau Un alt “Discurs asupra metodei” – continua exemplificarea conjecturala din „MODELARE…”, dar cu accent specific pe fenomenologia creatiei divine privind existenta si fiintarea, cuprinsa in opera profetului monoteismului, Moise.

   3. „MONOTEISMUL – ESENTA MORALEI NATURALE” sau Adaos la “Critica ratiunii practice”– exemplifica necesar, constructia paradigmatica a unui sistem filosofic apt, prin dimensiunea sa morala, previzionat atat de Moise in „Levitic” si „Numeri”, Descartes in „Regulae ad directionem ingenii”, cat si de Leibniz, in „Teodiceae”, dar mai ales de Kant in „Critica ratiunii practice”.

   4. „ADEVARURI BIBLICE, CONFIRMATE STIINTIFIC” sau Alt fel de “Critica a puterii de judecata”– incearca sa evalueze epistemologic unele dintre cele mai cunoscute afirmatii din vechile scripturi, cu scopul de a dovedi ca nivelul „puterii de judecare” nu depinde neaparat de evolutia societatii umane cum afirma,dealtfel, Immanuel Kant in „Critica puterii de judecare”.

   5. „MODELAREA RATIONALITATII…SI DINCOLO DE FIZICA” – contine preambulul, deja publicat, la noul sistem filosofic nonconformist si nonpsihologist, MESER.

   (Oricare text din preambul se regaseste in lucrarea nr. 1, deci lucrarea nu va fi postata)

   6. .„MODELLING RATIONALITY… AND BEYOND PHYSICS” – varianta in limba engleza a preambulului la sistemul filosofic MESER.

2. 

   Prof.Gh.C.Dinulescu-Campina on 2012-11-24 at 10:49 am

   Prof.Gh.C.Dinulescu-Campina

   08/31/2012

   Mr. President Marga
   We propose that ICR publisher to print my work original and nonconformist philosophical science from both scientifically and philosophically.
   If needed, you can meet reasonable time translates into English as we did with “… and Beyond Physics Modeling rationality” or any language that would work against international attention.
   Works to which they refer are:
   1. “Modeling physical and metaphysical rationality” or Contributions to the “Critique of Pure Reason” – modeled on mathematical and physical principles expected of Spinoza, the modern philosophical concept – the concept rationalist job.

   According to Cartesian principles of “Discourse on Method”, are reviewed immutable laws of the cosmos and the universe which are granted nonconformist interpretation, but high epistemological value. How to interpret the content of “pure reason” makes it seem eminently paradoxical yet. Is specified as the cosmos and the universe are addressed not as hypothetical as conjectural, one philosophical system providing mobility desirable natural interpretive phenomenology.

   2. “GENESISDICEAE” or another “Discourse on Method” – further exemplifying the conjecture of “MODELING …” but with specific focus on the phenomenology of divine creation of existence and being, included in operating prophet of monotheism, Moses.

   3. “Monotheism – ESSENCE natural moral” or additions to the “Critique of Practical Reason” – exemplifies necessary paradigmatic construction of a philosophical system fit through moral dimension, predicted as Moses in “Leviticus” and “Numbers” Descartes “Regulae ad directed ingenious “and the Leibniz in” Teodiceae “, especially by Kant in” Critique of Practical Reason. ”

   4. “Biblical truths, scientifically valid” or other type of “Critical power of judgment” – trying to evaluate some of the best known epistemological claims of ancient scripts in order to prove that the “power of judgment” does not necessarily depend on the evolution human society as say, in fact, Immanuel Kant in “Critique of judgment”.

   5. “… Rationality MODELING PHYSICS AND BEYOND” – contains the preamble, already published, the new philosophical system nonconformist and nonpsihologist items.

   (Any text of the preamble is found in paper no. 1, so the work will not be posted)

   6. . “… Rationality MODELLING PHYSICS AND BEYOND” – the English version of the preamble to the philosophical system job.